AI's wild take on rewilding: missing some crucial info

In this section
AI's wild take on rewilding: missing some crucial info

A new study from the University of Aberdeen has revealed that artificial intelligence may be shaping the future of rewilding in ways that create an idealised version of what restored nature can look like.

For the study, which is published in People & Nature by the British Ecological Society, researchers analysed AI‑generated images and descriptions of rewilding produced by chatbots and compared them with visual and textual materials used by UK rewilding advocacy organisations. The findings show that both sources consistently favour familiar, idealised aesthetics: dramatic landscapes, charismatic wildlife, and scenes notably free of people or the “messy” ecological processes that underpin real ecosystems — including decay, disturbance, and death.

The study warns that by repeatedly showcasing such selective imagery, rewilding organisations are inadvertently training AI systems to reproduce exclusionary visions of nature. As AI tools become increasingly embedded in communications and public engagement, these biases risk being reinforced and widely disseminated, shaping how future audiences perceive rewilded landscapes.

However, the researchers emphasise that this trend can still be reversed. By incorporating a wider, more inclusive visual content — featuring diverse species, human presence, and the full spectrum of ecological processes — organisations can help steer AI models toward more socially accurate and ecologically authentic representations of rewilding.

Dr Flurina Wartmann from the University of Aberdeen said: “Our research highlights a pressing societal issue: conservation organisations are, often unintentionally, encoding incomplete visions of nature into the AI systems that will influence how the next generation imagines our environment in the future. It also demonstrates how social science methods can – and must be - used to critically interrogate AI‑generated content.

“This study marks one of the first examples of Human Geographers analysing GenAI‑produced visual materials and highlights the importance of ensuring that emerging technologies reflect inclusive, realistic, and equitable depictions of the natural world.”

This project was in part funded by the Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery, which is generously supported by the Leverhulme Trust.

Search News

Browse by month

2026

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May There are no items to show for May 2026
  6. Jun There are no items to show for June 2026
  7. Jul There are no items to show for July 2026
  8. Aug There are no items to show for August 2026
  9. Sep There are no items to show for September 2026
  10. Oct There are no items to show for October 2026
  11. Nov There are no items to show for November 2026
  12. Dec There are no items to show for December 2026

2020

2019

2018

  1. Jan
  2. Feb There are no items to show for February 2018
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec

2017

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul There are no items to show for July 2017
  8. Aug
  9. Sep There are no items to show for September 2017
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec

2016

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr There are no items to show for April 2016
  5. May
  6. Jun There are no items to show for June 2016
  7. Jul
  8. Aug There are no items to show for August 2016
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec There are no items to show for December 2016

2015

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct There are no items to show for October 2015
  11. Nov
  12. Dec

2013

  1. Jan
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr There are no items to show for April 2013
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec There are no items to show for December 2013

2012

  1. Jan
  2. Feb There are no items to show for February 2012
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec There are no items to show for December 2012

2011

  1. Jan There are no items to show for January 2011
  2. Feb
  3. Mar
  4. Apr
  5. May
  6. Jun
  7. Jul There are no items to show for July 2011
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct
  11. Nov
  12. Dec

2010

  1. Jan There are no items to show for January 2010
  2. Feb There are no items to show for February 2010
  3. Mar There are no items to show for March 2010
  4. Apr There are no items to show for April 2010
  5. May There are no items to show for May 2010
  6. Jun There are no items to show for June 2010
  7. Jul There are no items to show for July 2010
  8. Aug
  9. Sep
  10. Oct There are no items to show for October 2010
  11. Nov
  12. Dec There are no items to show for December 2010

2009

  1. Jan There are no items to show for January 2009
  2. Feb There are no items to show for February 2009
  3. Mar
  4. Apr There are no items to show for April 2009
  5. May There are no items to show for May 2009
  6. Jun There are no items to show for June 2009
  7. Jul There are no items to show for July 2009
  8. Aug There are no items to show for August 2009
  9. Sep There are no items to show for September 2009
  10. Oct There are no items to show for October 2009
  11. Nov There are no items to show for November 2009
  12. Dec There are no items to show for December 2009