Last modified: 20 Jun 2025 15:09
Legal culture can be described as ‘ideas and expectations of law made operational by institutional practices’ (Sunde). Differing ideas and expectations about how law should be made operational lead to significant differences across legal systems globally, e.g. in terms of legal methodologies. Using a tried and tested analytical model, students become critically aware of these differences, enabling them to appreciate the rich cultural ‘grammar’ underlying laws as practised around the world.
| Study Type | Undergraduate | Level | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Term | Second Term | Credit Points | 15 credits (7.5 ECTS credits) |
| Campus | Aberdeen | Sustained Study | No |
| Co-ordinators |
|
||
One or more of these courses have a limited number of places. Priority access will be given to students for whom this course is compulsory. Please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions for more details on this process.
Law is often seen from one’s own jurisdictional or cultural standpoint. Consistent with the overall aims of the programme, this course seeks to introduce students to a comparative method whereby they may begin to understand the different cultural frameworks within which law operates and legal sources can be handled. ‘Legal culture’ here is understood as ideas and expectations made operational by institutional practices. Broadly, students will be asked to think of legal cultures not simply in terms of institutions of conflict resolution (e.g. courts) and norm producers (e.g. legislatures) but also as being shaped by factors made operational through those institutions (e.g. ideals of justice, legal methods and approaches to legal professionalisation). The use of such a ‘cultural’ model as a tool of legal analysis – originally developed by Professor Jørn Sunde of Oslo University – has been applied with great success for many years in Norwegian Law Faculties (see Handbook on Legal Cultures: A Selection of the World's Legal Cultures | SpringerLink).
Students will explore how such legal cultural ideas operate at the levels of individual jurisdictions, the state and the international order. They will also come to understand how such cultural ideas shape different ways of producing legal norms and both formal and informal sources of law (e.g. legislation, precedent and juristic opinion). At the same time, they will develop the methodological skills required to handle such sources of law, both in lectures and in tutorials.
The lectures will begin by introducing students to some fundamentals of comparative law. They will consider a range of basic questions. What is comparison in general, what is necessary for comparison to generate meaningful information, and what is comparative law? They will then be introduced to the important question of how one establishes an appropriate tertium comparationis. Students will the consider to various different approaches to comparison, including functionalism. At the same time, they will learn some of the difficulties involved in the taxonomic classification of legal orders, whether into families, traditions or through other devices. They will then consider Sunde’s legal cultural model in detail. Students will be asked to apply their knowledge and understanding of Sunde’s legal cultural model in the first tutorial.
Students will then consider the legal cultural model in operation in subsequent lectures. It will be applied to a range of different global legal cultures, relying in part on the detailed information in the Handbook on Legal Cultures mentioned above. The selection of the cultures will try to avoid the traditional model of finding cultures that represent the major legal families of the world; this has been shown to exclude many legal voices across the world that do not fit into the traditional (often Euro-centric) categories. In the second tutorial, students will be asked to prepare detailed comparisons of two or three legal cultures for discussion.
Having seen how the legal cultural model operates, students will then be asked to compare different aspects of different cultures in detail – e.g. they will be asked to consider why legal methodologies differ so widely across the world, with reference to other factors captured in Sunde’s legal cultural model. Lectures will explain, for example, how codified systems often pay considerable attention to principles of statutory interpretation, more so than systems that use precedent, in which one must learn methods of reasoning from precedent to precedent (e.g. by identifying the ratio decidendi of a past decision). Reference will also be made to the differing roles jurists and legal scholars play in different legal systems, and the cultural reasons for those divergences. The third tutorial will build on this knowledge, asking students to consider different mechanisms of norm production – e.g. statute, codes and precedents – and to analyse these sources using the legal cultural model.
Information on contact teaching time is available from the course guide.
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | Feedback Weeks | |||
| Feedback |
Feedback will be provided to all students within three weeks of submission, in accordance with the University’s policy. Feedback will take the form of brief comments to be entered into MyAberdeen, combined with an offer to all students to discuss their feedback via email in the first instance, and in person in the second. |
Word Count | 1000 | |
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Conceptual | Apply | Display critical awareness of different legal cultures and in particular the factors that lead to their adopting different legal methodologies. |
| Conceptual | Understand | Display knowledge and understanding of the fundamental purposes of comparative law and an introductory-level knowledge of methodologies of comparative law. |
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | 29 | Feedback Weeks | 32 | |
| Feedback |
Feedback will be provided to all students within three weeks of submission, in accordance with the University’s policy. Feedback will take the form of brief comments to be entered into MyAberdeen, combined with an offer to all students to discuss their feedback via email in the first instance, and in person in the second. |
Word Count | 1000 | |
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Conceptual | Apply | Display a capacity for critical analysis of individual legal cultures, using the legal cultural model developed by Sunde. |
There are no assessments for this course.
| Assessment Type | Summative | Weighting | 100 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Weeks | 49,50 | Feedback Weeks | 52,53 | |
| Feedback | ||||
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Knowledge Level | Thinking Skill | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Conceptual | Apply | Display critical awareness of different legal cultures and in particular the factors that lead to their adopting different legal methodologies. |
| Conceptual | Understand | Display knowledge and understanding of the fundamental purposes of comparative law and an introductory-level knowledge of methodologies of comparative law. |
| Conceptual | Apply | Display a capacity for critical analysis of individual legal cultures, using the legal cultural model developed by Sunde. |
We have detected that you are have compatibility mode enabled or are using an old version of Internet Explorer. You either need to switch off compatibility mode for this site or upgrade your browser.