New article published by Dr. Gearoid Millar: "Local Experiences of Liberal Peace: Marketization and
Dr. Gearoid Millar has published a new article in the Journal of Peace Research. "Local Experiences of Liberal Peace: Marketization and Emerging Conflict Dynamics in Sierra Leone" is now available 'online first' at http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/05/05/0022343316632580.abstract
Over the past 20 years scholars have repeatedly highlighted the complex relationship between conflict, peace, and economics. It is today accepted that economic factors at the global, regional, national, and local levels can promote conflict in various ways and that economic factors are therefore central in establishing a sustainable post-conflict peace. However, while the scholarly literature includes much nuance regarding the precise nature of these complex relationships, practices of peacebuilding are often far less nuanced. Instead there is a tendency to pin the hopes of fragile post-conflict states on establishing a liberalized and supposedly peace promoting economy and a worrying absence of grounded assessments of the impacts of such policies. This paper argues that the resulting lack of clarity regarding the local impacts of such peacebuilding mechanisms contributes to continued unwarranted enthusiasm for marketization among policy makers and practitioners.
This issue is addressed directly by exploring the destabilizing and potentially conflict inducing impacts of one Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) project in rural Sierra Leone. The dominance of liberal approaches to economic policy within peacebuilding has recently combined with a surge in large-scale FDI projects often labeled as “land-grabs” which can be interpreted as a direct embodiment of the liberal peace paradigm. While the liberal peace assumes that such projects will help by paying taxes, rebuilding state capacity, and employing idle young males, the paper illustrates that among local populations such projects can be experienced as deeply disruptive and potentially conflict promoting. It therefore describes four specific mechanisms by which the project in this setting endangers Sierra Leone’s still precarious transition to peace. The paper concludes with recommendations for peacebuilding theorists, policy advocates, and practitioners trying to navigate the difficult waters of post-conflict peacebuilding by way of large-scale FDI and marketization in general.