Summary

Health professionals do not always follow known best practice contributing to patients receiving less than perfect care. One strategy to improve healthcare delivery, known as Audit and Feedback (A&F), is to give health professionals data on how often they follow best practice and how often they do not. A&F is very popular worldwide and it is easy to see why; it is based on evidence, it can be provided at scale (i.e. to lots of health professionals within large organisations like the NHS) and it is a relatively inexpensive improvement strategy. A previous study, which combined the findings from over 140 experiments, showed that overall A&F works to improve healthcare delivery. However, it also showed that A&F is designed and delivered in lots of different ways and that sometimes A&F can make a big improvement on healthcare and sometimes only a small improvement. The science behind how, why and when it works best is very limited and in order for it to achieve the biggest improvements in healthcare this needs to be better understood. 
The main aim of this project is to contribute to understanding how to optimise A&F interventions for healthcare and increase the improvements that can be achieved in terms of quality, safety, efficiency and effectiveness.

The project will do this through:

•    Codesign of A&F for dentistry: working together with the intended users of audit and feedback (i.e. dental health professionals) to design A&F for dental practice
•    Investigating how organisations (i.e. health boards) currently use A&F and factors that influence its use across the organisation
•    Online testing of co-designed A&F for dental practice

Funder: The Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute 
Project lead: Dr Eilidh Duncan, THIS Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Project mentor: Prof Craig Ramsay
Project advisory group: Prof Louise Locock, Prof Marion Campbell, Prof Jan Clarkson, Dr Jeremy Grimshaw

Contact

Eilidh Duncan; e.duncan@abdn

Status

Data collection ongoing