Authors

Robert Heppner, Denise Heppner

Download

3_EITN_2021_01_27_Heppner.pdf

Abstract

This article explores Deborah Stone’s (1997) work regarding the types of language (specifically: symbols, numbers, causes, interests, and decisions) used to define and portray policy problems; and provides insightful discussion of the dynamics/complexity of such language within the context of an Indigenous educational initiative called the Pimacihowin Project. In becoming fluent in this type of language a researcher can learn to view educational policy problems from multiple perspectives. Stone’s work questions the ontological status of our own analytic concepts and reflects upon moral relativism. This analysis of insights gained from Stone’s work adopts a moral perspective, one grounded in social justice. Exploration of locally developed educational programs such as the Pimacihowin Project can provide great insight into culturally responsive pedagogy that is rethinking education, disrupting marginality, and meeting the needs of the communities that they serve.

content

Full Content in PDF.

Keywords

research, Indigenous, education, Canada, wayfinding

DOI

https://doi.org/10.26203/xq2c-hz80

Published in Volume 28(1) Wayfinding Conversations: rethinking education to disrupt marginality,

Top of page