The stiffness of articular
cartilage increases dramatically with increasing rate of loading, and
it has been hypothesised that increasing the stiffness of the subchondral
bone may result in damaging stresses being generated in the articular
cartilage. The juxtaposition of these tissues in a joint inevitably means
that changes in one will affect the other. Surprisingly, however, little
is understood of the nature of these effects or which are the most important
parameters governing this interplay. To begin to investigate this, a parametric
finite element model of an idealised joint has been developed (Fig
1). The model incorporates layers representing articular cartilage,
calcified cartilage, the subchondral bone plate and cancellous bone. Taguchi
factorial design techniques (1), employing a two-level
full-factorial and a four-level fractional factorial design, were used
to vary the material properties and thicknesses of the layers over the
wide range of values found in the literature. So far we have examined
the effects on the maximum values of von Mises stress in each of the tissues.
Not surprisingly, the stiffness of the cartilage turned out to be the
main factor that determined the stress in the articular cartilage. This,
and the thickness of the cartilage, also had the largest effect on the
stresses in all the other tissues with the exception of the subchondral
bone plate, in which stresses were dominated by its own stiffness. Perhaps
a bit surprisingly, the stiffness of the underlying subchondral bone had
no effect on the stresses generated in the cartilage.
Two consequences arise from these results. The first is that stiffening
of the subchondral bone, either the bone plate or the cancellous bone,
has very little effect on the stresses generated within the cartilage.
Whilst not precluding the involvement of subchondral bone in osteoarthritis,
this does not support the hypothesis that cartilage damage may arise by
this mechanism. Secondly, the softening and increased thickness seen in
the early stages of OA should reduce the stresses generated for a given
load in all the tissues and would appear, therefore, to be protective.
However, a concomitant reduction in strength and / or fatigue resistance
could be important, but these were beyond the scope of this study.
Fig 1) Parametric finite element model
of an idealised joint.
References
1) Dar F, Meakin JR, Aspden RM. Statistical methods in finite element
analysis. J Biomech 2002; 35:1155-1161.
2) F. H. Dar and R. M. Aspden. A finite element model of an idealised
diarthrodial joint to investigate the effects of variation in the
mechanical properties of the tissues. Proc.Instn.Mech.Engrs.[H], J.Eng.Med.
217 (5):341-348, 2003.
Department of Orthopaedics, University of
Aberdeen